{"id":13680,"date":"2016-06-01T15:07:18","date_gmt":"2016-06-01T19:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=13680"},"modified":"2016-06-01T15:12:57","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T19:12:57","slug":"matthew-porterfields-putty-hill-2010-take-what-you-can-carry-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=13680","title":{"rendered":"Matthew Porterfield&#8217;s Putty Hill (2010) + Take What You Can Carry (2015)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-13690\" src=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/PuttyHill_poster_s.jpg\" alt=\"PuttyHill_poster_s\" width=\"120\" height=\"178\" \/>This past Sunday I caught a screening of Matthew Porterfield\u2019s second feature film <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=13679\">Putty Hill<\/a> <\/strong>(2010) and his recent short <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=13679\">Take What You Can Carry<\/a> <\/strong>(2015) at Toronto\u2019s Royal Cinema, and although the former is available on DVD from Cinema Guild in North America (a release I\u2019ll review in full in the future), seeing the movie\u00a0in 35mm is a wholly different experience.<\/p>\n<p>Like his short film, <strong>Putty Hill<\/strong> was shot digitally, but the decision to opt for a film blow-up gives the production a <em>very<\/em> different visual texture that also affects the soundtrack. It\u2019s a unique example of how the type of media \u2013 in this case, film stock \u2013 can alter the impression of an overall work even though it\u2019s ostensibly the same footage and sound mix.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s also a novel approach in flipping the trend of shooting on film and finishing the work digitally, with distribution as a file or on disc, and yet video-to-film isn\u2019t new at all \u2013 just the boost in quality that in 2016 makes the final results more technically pleasing.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-13685\" src=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Electronovision_combo.jpg\" alt=\"Electronovision_combo\" width=\"360\" height=\"173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Electronovision_combo.jpg 360w, https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Electronovision_combo-300x144.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Among the earliest examples that come to mind is <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Electronovision\" target=\"window\">Electronovision<\/a>, which used a \u201chigh resolution\u201d video format t that was reshot on film off a kinescope. The trio of best-known films include <strong>Hamlet<\/strong> (1964) with Richard Burton, <strong>The T.A.M.I. Show <\/strong>(1964), and the quickie cash-in bio-drama <strong>Harlow<\/strong> (1965), based on the life of Jean Harlow.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-13688\" src=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Tape_Film_combo.jpg\" alt=\"Tape_Film_combo\" width=\"440\" height=\"234\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Tape_Film_combo.jpg 440w, https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Tape_Film_combo-300x160.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>A later use of video-to-film was Michelangelo Antonioni\u2019s <strong>The Oberwald Mystery<\/strong> \/<strong> Il mistero di Oberwald<\/strong> (1980), and a more daring attempt to bridge the gap between video and film resolution is the 1987 Italian-produced thriller <strong>Julia and Julia <\/strong>\/ <strong>Giulia e Giulia <\/strong>(1987), in which Sting and Kathleen Turner had the honor of starring in the first film to be shot on HD video and bumped to film.<\/p>\n<p>Neither of these films is available on DVD in North America, and <strong>Julia and Julia<\/strong> has never been mastered for home video from the original HD master. In its film blow-up, <strong>Julia<\/strong> looked like crap, but jump ahead to 2004, and Greg Harrison\u2019s weird suspense film <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/n2o\/3070_November2004.htm\" target=\"_blank\">November<\/a><\/strong> looked quite striking, shot in miniDV and blown-up to 35mm.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-13691\" src=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/TakeWhatYouCanCarry_poster_s.jpg\" alt=\"TakeWhatYouCanCarry_poster_s\" width=\"120\" height=\"180\" \/>Porterfield\u2019s world isn\u2019t wholly accessible to broad audiences, but certain <strong>Putty Hill<\/strong> and <strong>Take What You Can Carry<\/strong> have creative choices that are often quite rewarding for those eschewing classically structured dramas with familiar plots and resolutions, and from a technical stance,<strong> Putty Hill<\/strong> illustrates the benefit in bouncing between digital and analogue media to achieve a look that\u2019s tailored for distinct stories rather than commercial appeal.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cheers,<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mark R. Hasan<\/strong>, Editor<br \/>\n<strong>KQEK.com<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reviews of Matthew Porterfield&#8217;s 2015 short Take What You Can Carry + feature film Putty Hill (2010), recently screened at Toronto&#8217;s Royal Cinema, plus some quick thoughts on video-to-film releases.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13697,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[6],"tags":[4466,2562,2563,4473,4467,4469,4471,4472,4462,4474,4463,4304,4464,4470,4468],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/TakeWhatYouCanCarry_featured.png","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8nuyW-3yE","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13680"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13698,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13680\/revisions\/13698"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13697"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}