{"id":2909,"date":"2011-05-14T13:24:26","date_gmt":"2011-05-14T17:24:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/?p=1982"},"modified":"2011-05-14T13:24:26","modified_gmt":"2011-05-14T17:24:26","slug":"moguls-studios-part-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=2909","title":{"rendered":"Moguls &amp; Studios: Part I"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before I get into the meat of yet another series, quick  congratulations to the <a href=\"http:\/\/torontoundergroundcinema.com\/about.php\" >Toronto  Underground Cinema<\/a>, which is <a href=\"http:\/\/torontoist.com\/2011\/05\/weekend_planner_may_1415_2011.php\" >a year  old<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I interviewed co-owner <a href=\"http:\/\/mondomark.blogspot.com\/2010\/05\/big-trouble-in-chinatown-toronto.html\">Charlie  Lawton<\/a> prior to the cinema\u2019s grand opening in 2010, and it bodes well that  the city continues to enjoy a diverse group of indie cinemas that are giving  cineastes what they want without ersatz IMAX-ish screens, re-rendered 3D  engagements, and charging admissions a few hairs below $20 smackaroons.<\/p>\n<p>I think the studios were salivating over the potential of  prices cresting into the $20+ range this year, but that hasn\u2019t happened\u2026 yet.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1983\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"width: 259px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/JackLWarner_combopix_m.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1983\" title=\"JackLWarner_combopix_m\" src=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/JackLWarner_combopix_m.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"249\" height=\"188\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">See Jack smile&#8230; until you utter the word &quot;No.&quot;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Moving on, I\u2019ve uploaded a review of TCM\u2019s <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/m\/3777_MogulsMovieStars.htm\">Moguls &amp; Movie Stars: A History of  Hollywood<\/a><\/strong> [<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=2896\">M<\/a>] (Warner Home Video) which provides one of the best overviews of  the industry town\u2019s development, particularly for mid-level and newcomers to  film history.<\/p>\n<p>I still find it ironic that the total vertical integration  model could never be quashed by the U.S. Government. In the forties, studios  were slammed for block-booking and later told to divest themselves of their  theatre chains in the forties (aka the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.\" >Paramount  Decree<\/a>), but by 2011 the companies have evolved into the convergence models  dreamed up by their founders; they don\u2019t own talent agencies nor groom their  own stable of above-the-line talent anymore, but in terms of production, from  the point of pre-production seed money to the Blu-ray \/ DVD you\u2019re watching  right now, it\u2019s all one fluid system.<\/p>\n<p>One theme that comes up in the series\u2019 finale, and raised  again in the related panel discussion on the DVD set, is Hollywood\u2019s predictable response to Something  New \u2013 which isn\u2019t exclusive to the mogul mentality.<\/p>\n<p>Fear came from free radio shows, sound films, widescreen  processes, Technicolor, free TV, pay TV, home video, DVD, and digital  technologies, resulting in a knee-jerk reaction that \u2018it\u2019s all going to kill  the movies as we know it.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Series writer \/ producer Jon Wilkman makes a sharp little  point in the DVD set\u2019s last panel discussion: the various trends and challenges  over the past decades have brought the industry full circle to a point no one  quite expected.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Moguls &amp; Movie  Stars<\/strong> begins with stills of curious people looking at stereoscopic photos  through a viewer, and maybe 100 years later that personal relationship with  media is back, akin to you holding up an iPhone or any smart phone, and looking  at media. It\u2019s gone from images held in front of you to movie palaces and grand  audio-visual experiences, and now people are comfy watching media whenever and  however they want \u2013 and that lack of control scares the establishment.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not knowing what you want, how you want to see it, and  what to charge. Should it come with a digital copy, or should you be able to  download the file from a studio server with an access code? What should be the  final price? Will there be user fees? Expiration dates? And what will our  viewing behaviour be like 2 years from now?<\/p>\n<p>Behaviour and technology go hand in hand, because they feed  off each other. We need something better or less annoying, and along comes a  solution. The problem is sort of like the old axiom where four other  screenwriters are working on the same idea you\u2019re pounding out on the keyboard;  many talented minds are trying to figure out ways to make things better and  faster for themselves, and the solutions sometimes run contrary to issues of  ownership when those ideas go mainstream.<\/p>\n<p>Wilkman\u2019s series is both a fun history lesson and a stealth cautionary  note to the establishment to learn from the past and adapt instead of quash  threats, because history has shown some of the biggest perceived challenges  opened up substantive income streams; only a few practical minds recognized  that selling product to TV and producing original content for multimedia  platforms <em>was a good thing<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Walt Disney didn\u2019t have a massive studio in the fifties, but  he had a back catalogue of titles and characters he could exploit in movies and  TV, and moving production to the Idiot Box probably saved the company because  it pushed its product into the living rooms of families, and fostered the  Disney brand &#8211; from movies, music, shows and toys and a merchandising empire  unequaled by anyone, including George Lucas.<\/p>\n<p>(Of course, I could raise the issue of the Disney empire  lobbying successfully to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act\" >extend the  copyright law<\/a> from 50 to 70 years after a creator\u2019s death, but that just  creates an upset tummy, whichever way one leans.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Moguls &amp; Movie  Stars<\/strong> marks the first of another ongoing series here about movie moguls and  studios, and if you read the review, you\u2019ll find at the end a series of titles  \u2013 biographies, documentaries \u2013 also of note, some of which I\u2019ll cover now and  then with references to extant books worth snapping up.<\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, the best series on the studios, incidentally,  was published more than 20 years ago in a large coffee table size by Octopus  Books. Each volume contains a detailed preface on a studio\u2019s founding, and  chapters that assembled films produced and also released by said studio per  decade. The films are accompanied by a photo, and a concise yet compelling  synopsis. Each chapter includes a decades highlights preface, and the indexes  offer title and personnel searches.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/astore.amazon.com\/kqco06-20?_encoding=UTF8&amp;node=2\" >Awesome  series<\/a> for bibliophiles which spanned Columbia,  Disney, MGM, Paramount,  RKO, United Artists, Universal, and Warner Bros. A rival publisher stole some  thunder with their own tome on Twentieth Century-Fox, but it\u2019s a tepid effort.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mark R. Hasan<\/strong>,  Editor<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/Main_Index_Page.htm\">KQEK.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Part I of yet another series, we have a review of the TCM mini-series Moguls &#038; Movie Stars: A History of Hollywood (Warner Home Video), plus bonus editorial blather!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[474,4212],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8nuyW-KV","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}