{"id":3277,"date":"2011-07-23T14:31:32","date_gmt":"2011-07-23T18:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/?p=2250"},"modified":"2011-07-23T14:31:32","modified_gmt":"2011-07-23T18:31:32","slug":"stanley-kubrick-part-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=3277","title":{"rendered":"Stanley Kubrick, Part I"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Lolita1962_BR_b.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2252\" title=\"Lolita1962_BR_b\" src=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Lolita1962_BR_b.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"168\" \/><\/a>Truth be told, the first time I\u2019d seen <strong>Lolita<\/strong> (1962), I was bored, but that was perhaps 20 years ago, and  as happens with one\u2019s taste in music, things change, or rather one develops an  appreciation for different directors and their career phases.<\/p>\n<p>Uwe Boll is still a lower-tier Ed Wood, hence I\u2019ve no desire  to revisit his rabbit rubbish, but Stanley Kubrick was cut from a different  cloth (duh), and perhaps the most popular adjectives applied by critics and  non-fans towards this American icon is cold, dry, eccentric, weird, reclusive,  and perhaps a little mad.<\/p>\n<p>One quality few seem to get off the bat is how funny Kubrick  was, particularly in his later work. The last line in <strong>Eyes Wide Shut <\/strong>(1999), his final film, makes it clear the story you  just watched was a funny \u2013 not unlike the moment in David Fincher\u2019s <strong>The Game <\/strong>(1997) where a certain  character realizes everything that\u2019s been driving him to the brink of madness  was rooted in something\u2026 funny.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of EWS, it seemed to take punchline to make it  clear you just saw a darkly comedic film about obsessions, repressions, marital  bickering, and weird characters that fade in and out of dark store corners.<\/p>\n<p>Even <strong>Full Metal  Jacket <\/strong>(1987) was satirical, and Warner Bros. actually sold the film based  on fast clips in the trailer, and one character (dubbed \u201cJoker\u201d by his men)  uttering the phrase \u2018Sir&#8230; Does this mean that Ann-Margret&#8217;s not coming?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>But one has to step back another 25 years to see where  Kubrick found a project in which he could loosen up and allow his dry,  satirical wit to permeate elements in each shot.<\/p>\n<p>Lore has it that Kubrick rewrote much of Vladimir Nabokov\u2019s  own script, and while there are peculiar moments of slapstick in <strong>Lolita <\/strong>\u2013 notably Humbert Humbert trying  to unfold a cot while Lolita sleeps soundly in the hotel big bed \u2013 Kubrick satirizes  bad behaviour and overall wrongness by pitching the dialogue, the performances,  and long takes just high enough to make the ugliness of a professor sleeping  with a teenager ridiculous \u2013 an amazing accomplishment when there\u2019s plenty of  patently offensive behaviour throughout the film.<\/p>\n<p>As the evil Quilty who torments Humbert from a safe distance,  Peter Sellers augurs the film with his accents and impersonations, but even  with another actor in place of Sellers, the film would\u2019ve conformed to  Kubrick\u2019s sense of the absurd, because <strong>Lolita<\/strong> is a forerunner to the more outrageous behaviour in <strong>Dr. Strangelove<\/strong> (1964), which he co-authored with madman Terry  Southern.<\/p>\n<p>Warner Home Video recently issued <strong>Lolita<\/strong> and <strong>Barry Lyndon <\/strong>(1975)  on Blu-ray \u2013 two dryly funny satires that offer unique rewards to devoted  Kubrick fans, as well as sophisticates wanting literary absurdism perfectly  distilled into sound + image \u2013 and I\u2019m paring the reviews with some related  materials.<\/p>\n<p>In Part I, in addition to <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/j2l\/3910_Lolita1962.htm\">Lolita <\/a><\/strong>[<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=3270\">M<\/a>] (WHV), I\u2019ve also chosen to focus  on Kubrick\u2019s earliest work: his documentary shorts. His three films ought to  have been packaged in a single DVD set years ago, but that\u2019s never happened \u2013  either because of rights issues, or Kubrick feeling his nascent filmic efforts,  like his feature film debut <strong>Fear and  Desire <\/strong>(1953), were too immature to remain in circulation.<\/p>\n<p>His first two shorts (both made in 1951) were sold to RKO as  newsreels, and they\u2019ve popped up in various places on TV. <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/d\/3907_DayOfFight1951.htm\">Day  of the Fight <\/a><\/strong>[<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=3251\">M<\/a>] has been broadcast on TCM,  European TV (BBC, RAI) and is available via Archive.org, whereas <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/f\/3908_FlyingPadre.htm\">Flying Padre <\/a><\/strong>[<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=3257\">M<\/a>] has received less airplay.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Seafarers1953.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2253\" title=\"Seafarers1953\" src=\"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Seafarers1953.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"168\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/s\/3909_Seafarers1953.htm\">The Seafarers <\/a><\/strong>[<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=3262\">M<\/a>] (1953) did the rounds on YouTube,  but its rights were recently re-acquired, and a special edition DVD emerged in  2008 with extras, including an audio commentary track with directors Keith  David and Roger Avary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Seafarers<\/strong> was  Kubrick\u2019s first colour film, but he didn\u2019t return to colour until Kirk Douglas  nabbed him to direct <strong>Spartacus<\/strong> (1960) after director Anthony Mann was dismissed. Between 1951 \u2013 1960,  Kubrick\u2019s films were dramas, anti-war statements, noir, and documentaries, but  it wasn\u2019t until <strong>Lolita<\/strong> that he found  his groove, and slowly developed his mid- and late-career style of satire,  drama, and commentary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2001: A Space Odyssey<\/strong> (1968) was a unique exception, whereas <strong>The  Shining<\/strong> (1980) plays with varying aspects of spousal violence and madness.  I still think Stephen King, in his original assessment of the film, felt Kubrick  didn\u2019t quite understand the machinations of a horror story; perhaps the  striking sequences were designed to be nightmarish extensions of seething  violent tendencies, and as was Kubrick\u2019s desire to let audiences make the final  judgment, have them similarly figure out what the puzzle bits mean when  examined by each subjective viewer.<\/p>\n<p>In Part II, I\u2019ll have reviews of <strong>Barry Lyndon<\/strong>, plus the teasing BBC documentary <strong>Stanley Kubrick\u2019s Boxes<\/strong> (2008).<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mark R. Hasan<\/strong>,  Editor<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/Main_Index_Page.htm\">KQEK.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tied to a review of Warner Home Video&#8217;s shiny new Blu-ray of Lolita, I&#8217;ve added reviews of Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s first 3 films &#8211; all documentaries of sorts: Day of the Fight and Flying Padre (both released in 1951 by RKO), and The Seafarers, his first colour film, released in a special edition DVD by Indian Relay Films&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[612,613,245,603,189,614],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8nuyW-QR","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3277"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}