{"id":5282,"date":"2012-07-23T14:09:15","date_gmt":"2012-07-23T18:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=5282"},"modified":"2012-07-23T14:09:15","modified_gmt":"2012-07-23T18:09:15","slug":"dvd-gilda-1946","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=5282","title":{"rendered":"DVD: Gilda (1946)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><strong>Return to: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\">Home <\/a>\/\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?page_id=6\">Blu-ray, DVD, Film Reviews<\/a> \/ <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?page_id=619\">G<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Gilda.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-5283\" title=\"Gilda\" src=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/Gilda.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"168\" \/><\/a>Film: Excellent\/ DVD Transfer: Excellent\/ DVD Extras: Standard<\/p>\n<p>Label: Sony\/ Region: 1 (NTSC) \/\u00a0Released: November 7, 2000<\/p>\n<p>Genre: Film Noir<\/p>\n<p>Synopsis: Johnny idyllic working relationship with casino boss Mundson is thrown upside-down when ex-flame Gilda marries his new boss.<\/p>\n<p>Special Features: Cast &amp; Crew Bios \/ Rita Hayworth featurette \/ Theatrical Trailer<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Review:<\/p>\n<p>Beneath the film\u2019s reputation as the ultimate showcase of Rita Hayworth\u2019s sex  appeal is one of the best film noirs ever made, boasting a sharp script whose  plot <em>isn\u2019t<\/em> hard to follow, and superb performances by a trio of leading  actors and fine supporting cast.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gilda<\/strong> is many things \u2013 a noir, a postwar suspense-drama, a  musical of sorts \u2013 but perhaps due to the innate power of Hayworth\u2019s onscreen  magnetism, it\u2019s often remembered as something else, which has caused this lost  gem to be not only marginalized as a different kind of film, but be abandoned by  its studio as just another catalogue title &#8211; which frankly makes no sense. Where  Warner Bros. has continued to celebrate <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/c\/2530_Casablanca.htm\">Casablanca<\/a><\/strong> [<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=4922\">M<\/a>] (1941) as its most classic WWII  drama, Columbia done nothing to craft a special edition for its rough  equivalent, let alone load up a video release with important archival &amp;  critical extras.<\/p>\n<p>Marion Parsonnet\u2019s script (adapted by Jo Eisinger, and based on a story by  E.A. Ellington) is a blatant riff on <strong>Casablanca<\/strong>, but  repositioned to Argentina and towards the end of WWII. The country is a refuge  for fleeing industrialists and crooks, and Ballin Mundson\u2019s illegal gambling  joint is where the action happens \u2013 but only after specific characters are moved  into position.<\/p>\n<p>The first move brings gambler Johnny Farrell (Glenn Ford) into the lair of  Mundson (George Macready): the latter saves the former from a robbery, and the  two quickly establish a manager \/ owner relationship for the efficiently run  club. The second move has Mundson returning from a business trip with a new  acquisition \u2013 Gilda (Hayworth) \u2013 a self-confessed whore and nightclub dancer who  either took a fast shining to Mundson because of his money, or after an extended  conversation, realized she could get back at her old flame Johnny by marrying  his new boss.<\/p>\n<p>The messy circumstances aren\u2019t dissimilar to Rick still loving old flame  Isla, now married to goody-too-shoes Victor in <strong>Casablanca<\/strong>,  except being a film that moves from WWII to postwar South America within the  first third of its narrative, in <strong>Gilda<\/strong>, the key characters are  marinating in hate. Gilda hates Johnny and would prefer to die in a state of  sublime loathing, whereas Johnny detests Gilda, and when opportunity knocks \u2013  Mundson\u2019s sudden death \u2013 he makes sure Gilda suffers like a cat in heat locked  in a gilded cage.<\/p>\n<p>The emotional sadism is never subjugated in the script and performances, and  every move within the plot just makes the characters more desperate, even when  they\u2019re nestled in tight little niches. Equally important are the secondary  characters who hang around and make little salient, acerbic jabs regardless of  whether their opinions are wanted by either trio member, and by the finale the  smaller characters have affected their lives in fairly important ways.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gilda<\/strong>\u2019s reputation as a musical stems from two astounding  song &amp; dance numbers that don\u2019t happen until the final half hour, and it\u2019s a  remarkable cheat that developed over the years as the film\u2019s reputation morphed  from a noir to a genre it simply isn\u2019t. Right from the main titles, we\u2019re  treated to the luscious song \u201cAmado Mio\u201d which score composers Hugo Friedhofer  and Marlin Skiles work back &amp; forth throughout the film until Hayworth  performs a great little early morning version on guitar for spitting lavatory  attendant Uncle Pio (scene-stealer Steven Geray). When she finally performs the  song, it\u2019s not just a musical number, but a personal statement by Gilda to all  the men about her tormented state.<\/p>\n<p>Gilda\u2019s second number \u2013 the \u2018clothed striptease\u2019 \u201cPut the Blame on Mame\u201d \u2013  just happens without any portent because the character performs the song as a  fuck-you to Johnny: fed up playing gilded bird to her new husband, she steps  onto the casino\u2019s stage and performs a mock striptease, closing with an  invitation to have any man unzip her gown for the entire patron cartel.<\/p>\n<p>Both numbers may showcase Hayworth\u2019s gift as a dancer and her undeniable  screen power, but they\u2019re Gilda\u2019s painful statements to being messed up and in  need of salvation after being repeatedly tricked by her suitors into a state of  trust which each and every time turns into a terrible mistake. Johnny may be her  ideal mate, but there\u2019s no guarantee the two will return to their state of  sublime hate in another adventure.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s so much psychology worming its way through the story, yet its  sophistication in execution is often ignored. Charles Vidor \u2013 a director of much  lighter studio entertainment \u2013 borrows a bit from Joseph von Sternberg and makes  sure objects within every scene move towards the camera to create a 3D look.  Right from the opening shot where the camera cranes up from the floor as Johnny  rolls his dice towards the screen, we\u2019re involved spectators; the same can be  said of the party scenes where confetti and streamers are placed close to the  lens. Gilda herself moves in and out of layered shadows, and in her \u201cMame\u201d  number she steps forward and backwards in one bouncy, hair-flopping walk,  teasing the cinema\u2019s audience like the casino\u2019s mostly male admirers.<\/p>\n<p>Vidor also reserves Gilda\u2019s initial appearances to strategic shots: her intro  is a classic hair-toss after Mundson asks \u201cGilda \u2013 Are you decent?\u201d and when she  joins Johnny and Mundson at the casino, Vidor uses a reverse angle, showing just  the back of their booth and their shadows. Once it becomes clear to audiences  (and Mundson) that Gilda and Johnny share a torrid past, they\u2019re often captured  in two-shots while Mundson stands like a distant shadow, either at the camera\u2019s  edge, or in his own lonely medium shot.<\/p>\n<p>Rudolph Mat\u00e9, who was co-cinematographer on Hayworth\u2019s Technicolor debut  <strong>Cover Girl<\/strong>, really indulges in his gift for dramatic black  &amp; white imagery: his use of shadows, profiles, and striking layers of dim  lighting is remarkable, and he captures the tormented relationships of each trio  member. Mundson is often stark or seen in profile, being a watcher and  possessive lurker; Johnny is brightly centered because in spite of his tough  persona, he\u2019s still vulnerable and forced to hide his feelings and insecurities;  and Gilda always moves between layers of light and shadow because she has no  idea where resides a safe place. Her reliance on shadows and dark pools within  an otherwise brightly lit room says much about her mental state than any line of  dialogue.<\/p>\n<p>Ben Hecht reportedly did a clean-up job on the script, but what\u2019s unique  about <strong>Gilda<\/strong>\u2019s dialogue is how the characters engage in weird  elliptical verbal jousting matches, re-quoting each other\u2019s lines, throwing them  back at each other as puzzle riddles, and often saying exactly what they mean  just to see if the other reacts in a manner that\u2019ll unmask a secret, or expose a  vulnerable crack.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s inarguable no other cast could\u2019ve delivered the dialogue so tightly,  because <strong>Gilda<\/strong> is superbly staffed by Columbia\u2019s in-house  talent. Ford depiction of Johnny\u2019s personal torment and seething need for  revenge is almost empathetic, whereas Macready never wavers in maintaining  Mundson\u2019s rigid calm and sense of firm control when his life may be in danger.<\/p>\n<p>Gilda, however, isn\u2019t a traditional femme fatale: she\u2019s a victim of bad  decisions and circumstances, and her appeal is both as a sex object and the  wounded child aggressive men are compelled to own, and as happens repeatedly:  her \u2018husbands\u2019 and flings exploit her neediness for their own enjoyment. As  typical of a postwar noir, the warped mores and taboo-breaking is very frank:  Gilda sleeps around, and her teasing new suitors makes it clear she\u2019s open for  business, and game for anything wild and disreputable.<\/p>\n<p>The finale where Gilda confesses to exaggerating her wayward behaviour during  her original courtship with Johnny was contrived for the era\u2019s censors, and  perhaps to please audiences: by this point the couple <em>have<\/em> to walk off  into the sunset together because whether the screenwriters were aware during the  writing stage, it would\u2019ve been too cruel to deny the two charismatic actors and  their characters a happy ending. Their future harmony is left rather grey, but  certainly the closing music cue makes it clear a shroud of gloom\u2019s been pulled  away, and the couple has a genuine shot at some earnest happiness.<\/p>\n<p>Columbia\u2019s DVD sports a fine transfer with meager extras that include short  text menus, trailer, and part of a longer Hayworth featurette that\u2019s strangely  lopped off at the end just as details of her later career get interesting. More  than 60 years since its release, <strong>Gilda<\/strong>\u2019s in need of a  Criterion-style special edition, preferably on Blu-ray.<\/p>\n<p>Charles Vidor directed Hayworth in a quartet of films, including <strong>The  Lady in Question<\/strong> (1940) with Glenn Ford, <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/c\/3997_CoverGirl1944.htm\">Cover Girl<\/a> <\/strong>[<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=5275\">M<\/a>] (1944),  <strong>Gilda<\/strong> (1946), and <strong>The Loves of Carmen<\/strong> (1948)  with Ford again.<\/p>\n<p>Rudolph Mat\u00e9 would switch from cinematography to directing a  year later, and was responsible for expanding the film noir and suspense genres  with taut classics such as <strong>D.O.A.<\/strong> (1950) and <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/t2u\/3540_UnionStation1950.htm\">Union  Station<\/a><\/strong> (1950) before ending his career with colourful yet shallow  spectacles such as <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/t2u\/2925_300Spartans.htm\">300  Spartans<\/a><\/strong> (1962).<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 2012 Mark R. Hasan<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>External References<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0038559\/\">IMDB <\/a>&#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.soundtrackcollector.com\/catalog\/soundtrackdetail.php?movieid=13850\">Soundtrack Album<\/a> &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.soundtrackcollector.com\/composer\/1851\/Hugo+Friedhofer\">Composer Filmography<\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Return to<\/strong>:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\">Home <\/a>\/\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?page_id=6\">Blu-ray, DVD, Film Reviews<\/a> <\/em>\/\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?page_id=619\">G<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Return to: Home \/\u00a0Blu-ray, DVD, Film Reviews \/ G . Film: Excellent\/ DVD Transfer: Excellent\/ DVD Extras: Standard Label: Sony\/ Region: 1 (NTSC) \/\u00a0Released: November 7, 2000 Genre: Film Noir Synopsis: Johnny idyllic working relationship with casino boss Mundson is thrown upside-down when ex-flame Gilda marries his new boss. Special Features: Cast &amp; Crew Bios [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[18],"tags":[1447,352,1448,1180],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8nuyW-1nc","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5282"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5282"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5282\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5287,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5282\/revisions\/5287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}