{"id":7828,"date":"2010-03-29T01:54:48","date_gmt":"2010-03-29T05:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mondomark.com\/?p=705"},"modified":"2010-03-29T01:54:48","modified_gmt":"2010-03-29T05:54:48","slug":"life-after-a-tv-death","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/?p=7828","title":{"rendered":"Life After a TV Death"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"width: 198px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/i917.photobucket.com\/albums\/ad14\/wegeewegee\/LizzieBorden_s.gif\" alt=\"Meet Your Friendly Network Avatar\" width=\"188\" height=\"238\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Meet Your Friendly Network Avatar<\/p><\/div>\n<p>On Saturday March 27th, series co-producer\/director  Jon Cassar announced in a Twitter feed that Fox had decided to ax <strong>24<\/strong>, ending a period of speculation as  to whether the network would give the show another year of life.<\/p>\n<p>So ends a ground-breaking show whose terrorist plots were built  around 24 hours of a single day, and contained the greatest concentration of  Canadian talent for a single TV series.<\/p>\n<p>(Unless that Canuckle talent finds work  soon, they may be doomed to appear in SyFy TV movies about alien marshmallows,  or more Clive Barker \u2018presentations\u2019 based on napkin doodles scribbled during a Via ride  to Vancouver.)<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m actually not surprised the show\u2019s been axed, though my  suspicions are due to a number of issues. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/t2u\/2192_24Season1.htm\">Season 1<\/a> was  perfect, Season 2 was pretty good; Season 3 had one good episode, and the rest  was rabbit rubbish; Season 4 had half a good episode, and the rest had the CTU unit  reduced to the most inept group of secret service dingbats, incapable of  protecting the U.S.  from a rogue shipment of rancid cabbage.<\/p>\n<p>I actually have no memory of Season 5 because it seems to  have blurred with Season 6, but I <em>do<\/em> recall Season 6 being great fun, and making me eager for further adventures of  Jack Bauer, a loyal American patriot (played by Canadian Kiefer Sutherland) who  technically died in an episode, and technically still has a weak heart from all  that shock-torture-drug stuff (ailments that\u00a0  everyone convenient \u2018forgot\u2019 in later seasons).<\/p>\n<p>No matter, since Jack returned for a 7th and the  current 8th Season, but I think the reason the show\u2019s been felled  may be due to its high cost (full action sequences spread over 24 episodes is  pricey), a high-profile and very large cast, a star who may be getting tired of  all that running and jumping, Fox\u2019 alleging low ratings of a boo-hoo 9 million  from prior 13 million, and perhaps the character of Bauer being less relevant  today.<\/p>\n<p><strong>24<\/strong> benefitted  from a tense sense of paranoia within the U.S. of terror striking from sleeper  cells and porous border control, and the series\u2019 writers often incorporated  current and possible news items that kept it current, but with the terror fear  subjugated by real economic woes today, people may want outright escapism \u2013 3D  action and fantasy films \u2013 instead of a series that tells them Your World is  Crumbling over 24 week period.<\/p>\n<p>Even James Bond left a muffled impact at the box office last  year with the rotten egg <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kqek.com\/dvd_reviews\/p2r\/3435_QuantumOfSolace.htm\">The Quantum  of Solace<\/a><\/strong>, so perhaps stories about global terrorism or singular  despots are too negative when people are losing houses, jobs, and the realities  of living on credit push audiences for fantastic tales.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s all speculation, and it may well be audiences are  growing tired of Bauer, but Fox can still exploit the character while he\u2019s  fresh in the minds of avid fans. What Fox and Sutherland shouldn\u2019t do is a  one-time feature film; it failed miserably on both occasions for <strong>The X-Files<\/strong>, and neither film offers  anything of merit to the lore and characters of the show\u2019s first five years.<\/p>\n<p>What Fox and Sutherland <strong>should<\/strong> do is a series of TV movies \u2013 basically an entire season without the fat, silly  tangents and filler episodes. Just Jack dealing with a persistent threat that  unfolds in two, three or four 90 min. cliffhanger teleplays that closes the  Bauer saga over a four month period.<\/p>\n<p>The damned things would sell as a four-movie DVD set with  longer director cuts and extras, and one of the most inventive shows ends with  dignity, instead of being left unresolved, or picked up by another network  (NBC\u2019s been rumored to have expressed interest), and altered to suit the  network\u2019s in-house style.<\/p>\n<p>Fox never cared what was said or shown on TV as long as ad  sales and ratings were solid, so I doubt more conservative NBC would allow a  character to have his body drilled repeatedly with a foot-long power tool. (It  happened, and it was <em>nasty!<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>Now\u2019s the time for clarity and sober thinking, so here\u2019s  hoping Fox and Sutherland don\u2019t muck up a good thing. The final episode of <strong>24<\/strong> airs May 24th on Fox in  the U.S., and Global in Canada.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>To the other end is Roger Ebert\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.suntimes.com\/ebert\/2010\/03\/see_you_at_the_movies.html\" target=\"window\">own  blog <\/a>on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cinematical.com\/2010\/03\/24\/at-the-movies-canceled\/\" target=\"window\">cancellation <\/a>of <strong>At the Movies<\/strong>, the show he  and partner Gene Siskel started in 1975. Disney axed the syndicated show this  past March 24th, and Ebert, ever the active soul, has plans to get a new show  going.<\/p>\n<p>Ebert describes the new project a bit, and he gives an  elegiac tribute to his old beloved show in what may be the most dignified  tribute to a series from which a host was ousted. (Ebert and co-host Richard Roeper  \u2018cut ties\u2019 with Disney when the company wanted to revamp the show into <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pablum\" target=\"window\">Pablum<\/a>, but it\u2019s still a putsch  orchestrated by a parent company.)<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s the classiest thing I\u2019ve read in a while, and I hope  the new project becomes a reality, meeting all of the requirements in Ebert\u2019s  outline. What\u2019s surprising is not that his aim to cover current, past,  contemporary, classic, and indie work is daring; that\u2019s <em>exactly<\/em> what he used to do with Siskel before <em>roepertitis<\/em> and <em>pablumitis<\/em> became incipient.<\/p>\n<p>Film criticism has taken a good forty whacks to the head as  media enterprises keeping gutting their permanent staff, so maybe Ebert\u2019s  project might bring some intelligence back to film review shows.<\/p>\n<p>More editorial blather to follow.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; MRH<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thoughts on the cancellation of Fox&#8217; iconic 24, and Roger Ebert&#8217;s tribute to the now-dead At the Movies \u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8nuyW-22g","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7828"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kqek.com\/mobile\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}